Journal Club – December 2020

Safety and Efficacy of the SNAP 12-hour Acetylcysteine Regimen for the Treatment of Paracetamol Overdose – [LINK HERE]

Wed 16th Dec 12-13:00

TEAMS meeting

  • Everyone is welcome – Nursing and medical, no experience necessary
  • Read the article  – check your emails
    • (we have emailed out to you – if not, email darren or huw and we will send a copy)
  • Your opinion – Whats good and bad about the study, would this change your practice?
  • Come along – We will discuss; how to read a paper, what everyone thinks about the paper
  • if you can’t make it – feel free to post your thoughts below so we can bring them up

Outcome

Pros

  • Highly relevant to practice in the ED
  • Used a UK ED population
  • Large sample size
  • Usedall patients attending with paracetamol overdose requiring treatment
  • Good Follow-Up

Cons

  • Using 2 separate cohorts that span 2 yrs, may be convenient but may hide significant differences in both population and hospital practice
  • Anaphylactoid definition “patient prescribed antihistamine” , again convenient but prob not accurate
    • The amount of anaphylactoid reactions reported seems excessive compared to our experience (but is this because they occur more frequently outside the ED)
  • One of the aims was to examine effectiveness invarious overdose types (e.g. delayed presentation, staggerd overdose), but didn’t have the numbers for subgroup analysis
  • More staggered overdoes in the 12hr SNAP group – was this a function of teaching in preparation to changing protocol or was it truly different?

Overall

  • We agreed that the 12hr SNAP protocol seems to be an effective alternative to the current 21hr regime in preventing liver damage.

Further question generated

  • All patients meant to have bloods done at 24hrs? – good for internal validity but if put into practice negates the major benefit of the 12hr regime
  • Data on Children? – we would like to know it’s effective in a paediatric population (as do we want 2 regimes and the chance of error)
  • Is 21hr regime more effective? – it was postulated in the paper late presentations have a poorer outcome. There were significantly more late presentations in the 21hr group, but no difference in overall effectiveness (so is 21hr better?)
  • Extended 12hr regime? – we couldn’t see how many patients in the 12hr SNAP group had their treatment extended upto 21hr  (only beyond 21hr).
  • Excess repeat overdose? – in the 12hr SNAP group there was a significant 2.1% increase in repeat overdoses. Did reducing the side-effect profile and length of antidote encourage repeat overdose? OR were we seeing a variance in population behavior.

2 comments

  1. Gareth Bessant says:

    Agree that if needing >20hours bloods then no improvement in length of stay, if only improvement is use of antihistamines, then cannot see clinically important advantage over familiar regieme.

    • embeds says:

      unsurprisingly a “significant” number of patients were discharged prior to the 24hr bloods in the SNAP Group (TOXBASE suggest patients can be discharged is bloods ok at the end of the 12hr regime)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 4 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.